Create intermediate Works with: Any AI

One-Page Case Summary for an Ombudsman or Regulator

Structured brief Has example

Condense a long dispute into a page a case handler can read quickly.

The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.

Write a one-page case summary. The parties and their roles: [PARTIES]. A chronology of events I have: [CHRONOLOGY]. The amounts: [AMOUNTS]. The steps I took and the replies: [STEPS_AND_REPLIES]. The documents I hold: [DOCUMENTS]. The outcome I seek: [DESIRED_OUTCOME].

Use this layout: heading with names and reference numbers; a three-sentence summary; a numbered timeline of no more than ten key events; a short section 'what the organisation said' with quotations under 20 words; 'where we disagree' in two to four bullets; 'what I ask' in one sentence; and an enclosure list. Keep the total under 450 words. Replace adjectives with facts, remove anything that is not needed to understand the dispute, and mark any date I should check.

Return the page first, then a list of facts I should double-check and what is missing.

I want help, not legal advice. Name no rule I did not supply. Use [JURISDICTION] and [RELEVANT_LAW_OR_POLICY_IF_KNOWN] as given. Point me to a consumer agency. Promise no result.

Fill in before use

Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.

Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.

Case: Reed v. Northfield Energy, ref NE-22018
Summary: Estimated bills since 2022 of about double my actual use; final response on 9 June refused a recalculation.
Timeline: 3 Jan meter photo sent; 10 Feb bill 612 (estimated); 3 Mar complaint; 9 Jun final response.
They said: 'Estimates are based on previous use.'
We disagree on: the opening reading and whether my photos were used.
I ask: a recalculated bill based on readings.
Enclosures: bills, photos, final response.
Facts to double-check: the date of the final response, the exact amount in dispute (612 versus 580), and whether the second meter photo was sent before or after 3 March.

• template
• summary