Peer Review Report Structure
Write a fair, constructive review.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
[VERIFY] is an editorial flag, not a blank to fill. Wherever the prompt shows [VERIFY], check that item against a reliable source before you use it.
Help me structure a peer review. The manuscript's title, field and a summary of its claims: [MANUSCRIPT_SUMMARY]. My notes on strengths and concerns: [NOTES]. The journal's reviewer guidelines: [GUIDELINES]. Create a report outline: a summary of the paper in my own words, an assessment of significance, major concerns (numbered, with reasons and suggestions), minor points, and a recommendation. Rewrite my notes into respectful, specific comments, separating issues that affect validity from presentation issues. Include a checklist for confidentiality (do not share the manuscript, do not use it for my own work), conflicts of interest, and use of AI tools as allowed by the journal [VERIFY]. Avoid personal remarks and speculation about the authors. Also add a short list of questions to ask while reading, such as do the conclusions follow from the data and are alternative explanations considered, and a time plan for completing the review within the requested deadline.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.