Past Paper Marking Self-Audit

Check how honestly I mark my own work.

Added October 15, 2026. Written with AI assistance and checked for clarity and placeholders; not reviewed by a lawyer, accountant, clinician or other professional. How these prompts are made

The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.

[VERIFY] is an editorial flag, not a blank to fill. Wherever the prompt shows [VERIFY], check that item against a reliable source before you use it (what [VERIFY] means).

Audit my self-marking of a past paper. The questions, my answers and the mark scheme points: [ANSWERS_AND_SCHEME]. The marks I gave myself: [MY_MARKS]. The examiner's report if available: [EXAMINER_REPORT].

Re-mark my answers against the scheme, find generous marks, missed credit, and the type of errors (knowledge, method, reading, time). Compare with the examiner's common mistakes.

Return a table with Question, My mark, Re-marked, Difference and Error type, the three patterns most costing marks, and a plan for the next paper. Treat this as practice, not an official result.

Also suggest a method for asking a teacher or friend to mark a second sample, to calibrate how generous or harsh I am. Add a list of the question types where I most often lose marks, and a plan to practise those, then re-test after a week.

Then convert the findings into a targeted practice cycle. For each error type, assign a remedy: knowledge gaps go to a mini-lesson and flashcards, method errors to worked examples and redoing the question after a day, reading errors to underlining command words, and time errors to timed sections. Build a two-week schedule with past paper questions chosen by topic, using only papers I have access to. Provide a log template with date, question, mark, error type and fix, and a rule for re-testing weak topics after three days and after one week. Add a method for estimating the grade I might achieve with caution, using the mark scheme and the grade boundaries I supply, and a note that boundaries change and results are not predictions. Include a plan for asking my teacher to mark one answer for calibration. Exam rules and boundaries are [VERIFY].

Finish with a summary of how the recommended changes affect cost, time and risk, using only the figures I supplied and marking any estimate clearly as an estimate.

Fill in before use

Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.

Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.

Re-marked results (invented maths paper, 60 marks)
My total: 46. Re-marked against the scheme: 41.
Q4 (6 marks): I gave 6; scheme gives 4 (final answer correct but method marks need a stated formula). 
Q8 (5): I gave 3; scheme gives 4 (credit for the correct first step).
Q11 (8): I gave 7; scheme gives 3 (arithmetic slip carried through, plus units missing).
Error types over the 19 marks lost: method 8, arithmetic 6, reading 3, time 2.
Two-week plan: redo Q4 and Q11 after a day; five units questions; one timed section. Estimate of grade is not a prediction; boundaries [VERIFY].

• audit