Feedback Interpretation Audit: What Did the Comments Really Ask For?
Turn marker comments into actions.
Added October 15, 2026. Written with AI assistance and checked for clarity and placeholders; not reviewed by a lawyer, accountant, clinician or other professional. How these prompts are made
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
Help me interpret feedback. The assignment and mark: [ASSIGNMENT_AND_MARK]. The comments I received, pasted: [FEEDBACK_COMMENTS]. The marking criteria: [CRITERIA]. My own view of where I lost marks: [MY_VIEW]. For each comment, translate it into plain words, link it to a criterion, classify it (content, structure, analysis, referencing, expression), and write a specific action I can take with an example of what better could look like. Make a table with Comment, Meaning, Criterion, Action, and Priority. Count how often each category appears, with the arithmetic, to show the recurring issue. Draft three questions I can ask my teacher to clarify unclear comments and a short plan for the next assignment with a checklist. Be honest and kind. Do not assume what the marker meant if it is ambiguous; say so. Add a worked translation: 'needs more critical analysis' becomes 'for each source, say what it shows, what its limits are, and how it affects your argument, in at least two sentences'; and a count of feedback categories over three assignments to show a recurring issue.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.
See an example result (fictional data)
Comment | Meaning in plain words | Criterion | Action | Priority 'Needs more critical analysis.' | For each source say what it shows, its limits, and how it affects your argument | Analysis | add two sentences after each source in the next essay | high 'Referencing inconsistent.' | Some citations differ in format | Referencing | check all against the style guide | medium 'Good structure.' | keep | Structure | none | low Counts over three assignments: analysis comments 3 of 7 (43 percent), referencing 2 (29 percent).
Illustrative only, made-up data. Your results will differ and must be reviewed.