Competitor Content and SEO Comparison
Understand competitors' content strategies.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
[VERIFY] is an editorial flag, not a blank to fill. Wherever the prompt shows [VERIFY], check that item against a reliable source before you use it.
Compare my content strategy with three competitors using only the information I paste or that you can verify through search (mark unverified items as [VERIFY]). Me: [MY_SITE_AND_CONTENT_SUMMARY]. Competitors: [COMPETITOR_SITES_AND_CONTENT_SUMMARIES]. Target topics: [TARGET_TOPICS]. Score each site from 1 to 5 on these criteria with a one-line reason: 1. Topic coverage for the target topics. 2. Depth and originality (first-hand data, examples, expert input). 3. Content formats (guides, tools, video, templates). 4. Freshness and update rhythm. 5. Internal linking and topic hubs. 6. Evidence of authority (authors, citations, references). 7. Conversion paths from content. 8. Estimated search visibility, if tools or data are provided; otherwise write "not assessed". Show a comparison table with totals. Then list five topics where competitors outrank me and why, five where I have an advantage, and three content ideas they do not cover. Give the format and angle for each idea. Do not guess traffic numbers. Keep the comparison fair by scoring all four sites against the same evidence, and say clearly when a score rests on a small sample of pages.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude or another assistant.