Create intermediate Works with: Any AI

Blog Post Quality Rubric and Editing Checklist

Rubric scoring Has example

Create a scoring system to review drafts.

The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.

[VERIFY] is an editorial flag, not a blank to fill. Wherever the prompt shows [VERIFY], check that item against a reliable source before you use it.

Create a scoring system for blog drafts and use it on my draft. Blog topic and audience: [BLOG_TOPIC_AND_AUDIENCE]. Goal of this post: [POST_GOAL]. Target keyword, if any: [TARGET_KEYWORD]. Draft: [PASTE_DRAFT].

Rubric: score each from 0 to 4, where 0 means missing and 4 means excellent, with a quote from the draft and a fix:
1. Purpose and promise: the title and opening state what the reader gets.
2. Audience fit: level, vocabulary, and examples.
3. Originality: personal experience, data, or a point of view rather than a summary of other posts.
4. Evidence and accuracy: claims supported with sources; flag items to verify as [VERIFY].
5. Structure: headings, order, scannability, and length suited to the topic.
6. Clarity and style: short sentences, concrete language, active voice.
7. Engagement: stories, examples, and rhythm.
8. Practical value: steps, templates, or decisions the reader can use.
9. Search basics: title, headings, meta description, internal links, image alt text (without keyword stuffing).
10. Call to action and next step.

Show the total out of 40 with a verdict (publish, revise, rethink), a top-five fix list, and an editing checklist in three passes (structure, line edit, proofread). Add suggestions for a stronger opening and conclusion, but keep my voice.

Fill in before use

Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.

Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.

Scores (0-4): purpose and promise 3; audience fit 3; originality 1 ("mostly a summary of other posts"); evidence 2 (three claims need sources); structure 3; clarity 3; engagement 2; practical value 2; search basics 2 (no meta description); call to action 1.
Total 22/40: revise.
Top fixes: (1) add your own test or story in section 2; (2) cite sources for the 40% claim [VERIFY]; (3) rewrite the opening: "Most beginner gardeners kill their first tomato plant by June. I did it twice."; (4) add a meta description; (5) end with one clear next step.
Editing passes: structure, line edit (cut 15%), proofread.

• editing