Performance Improvement Plan Draft
Document a fair, supportive plan.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
[VERIFY] [ADD EVIDENCE] is an editorial flag, not a blank to fill. Wherever the prompt shows [VERIFY], check that item against a reliable source before you use it.
Draft a performance improvement plan (PIP) outline for review by HR. Role and tenure: [ROLE_AND_TENURE]. Performance gaps with documented examples (dates, facts): [GAPS_AND_EXAMPLES]. Expectations previously communicated: [EXPECTATIONS_COMMUNICATED]. Support already offered: [SUPPORT_OFFERED]. Produce: a plan structure with purpose, specific gaps stated factually, required standards (measurable), support the company will provide (training, coaching, time), check-in dates and format, timeline (common practice varies, often between 30 and 90 days; propose a length with reasoning and check it against your policy and local rules), how progress will be measured, and possible outcomes (successful completion, extension, further action). Include a pre-conversation checklist (were expectations clear? was feedback given? are there health, personal, or discrimination issues to consider? is it consistent with how others were treated?). Add a meeting script (100 words) that is respectful, a weekly progress log template, and wording to avoid (labels, personal criticism, predictions). Legal requirements for performance management and dismissals vary widely; get review by HR and an employment lawyer in [JURISDICTION] before use [VERIFY]. Use only the facts provided; mark missing evidence as [ADD EVIDENCE].
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.
See an example result (fictional data)
Purpose: help Alex meet the expected standard in accuracy of monthly reports. Gaps (factual): 4 of the last 6 reports had errors over 2 percent (dates: 3 Jan, 7 Feb, 5 Mar, 4 Apr); the standard is under 1 percent. Standard: reports with errors under 1 percent for three consecutive months. Support: training session on 12 May, a reviewer for the first two reports, weekly 30-minute check-ins. Timeline: 60 days (to be set after HR review). Measure: error rate from the review log. Outcomes: successful completion, extension, or further action after review. Meeting script (about 100 words): "This plan is to support you. Here is what we noticed, here is the help, and here is how we will measure progress." HR and an employment lawyer review before use [VERIFY].
Illustrative only, made-up data. Your results will differ and must be reviewed.