Audit intermediate Works with: Any AI

Evidence Strength Audit: Which Documents Carry Weight and Which Do Not

Table output Has example

Rate each item of evidence for relevance, clarity and reliability.

The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.

Audit my evidence. List of items with descriptions and dates: [EVIDENCE_LIST]. The claims I want to prove: [CLAIMS]. The other side's likely arguments: [THEIR_ARGUMENTS].

Rate each item from 1 to 5 for relevance, clarity (is the date, source and content visible), reliability (original or edited, third-party or mine) and completeness (is anything cut off). Make a table with Item, Claim supported, Scores, Weakness, and How to improve (a clearer screenshot, the full email thread, a third-party record). Identify which claims have only weak evidence and which items are repetitive. Recommend the five best items for a short pack and the order to present them. Suggest what to request from the other side or third parties to fill gaps.

Do not suggest creating or altering evidence. Be candid and make no predictions.

Treat this as writing help only. Quote no statute from memory. Use [JURISDICTION] and [RELEVANT_LAW_OR_POLICY_IF_KNOWN] as given. Flag where I need expert help. Promise no result.

Fill in before use

Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.

Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.

Item | Claim | Relevance | Clarity | Reliability | Completeness | Fix
Photo of crack | oven damaged on arrival | 5 | 3 (no date) | 4 | 5 | add the delivery date from the file
Screenshot of chat | promised a repair | 5 | 4 | 3 (cropped) | 2 | send the full thread
Receipt | purchase | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | none
Best three: receipt, delivery note, photo. Ask the seller for their chat transcript and the engineer's report.