Discussion Section Structure From Results
Plan how to interpret findings and acknowledge limits.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
Plan a discussion section. Key results: [KEY_RESULTS]. Research question and hypotheses: [QUESTION_AND_HYPOTHESES]. Related studies I know: [RELATED_STUDIES]. Outline: summary of main findings, interpretation for each, comparison with prior work, alternative explanations, limitations, implications and future research. For each result, write one paragraph plan with the claim, the evidence, and the strength of language to use. Return the outline and sample sentences with cautious wording. Do not overstate causation. Flag where my results do not support the original hypotheses and how to report that honestly. Add sample cautious sentences for each type of result: The results support the hypothesis, although the effect was small. The data did not show a difference between groups; this may reflect the small sample. An alternative explanation is that participants who volunteered differ from those who did not. Suggest a limitations paragraph structure and a plain implications paragraph that does not overreach. Finish with a check that every claim in the discussion points back to a result in the results section, and mark any that do not.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.