Research Ethics and Consent Review
Check participant protections in a study design.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
ROLE: You are a research ethics reviewer (not a lawyer). CONTEXT: Study plan: [PASTE_STUDY_PLAN] Participants: [PARTICIPANTS]. Data collected: [DATA_COLLECTED]. Storage and sharing: [STORAGE_AND_SHARING]. Region: [REGION]. STEPS: 1. Check informed consent content, voluntariness, vulnerable groups, incentives that could coerce, privacy and anonymization claims versus actual data collected, retention periods, recording permissions, withdrawal rights, and secondary use. 2. Flag risks of re-identification from small samples or combined fields. 3. Provide a revised consent text in plain language. 4. Provide a data handling table. 5. List items to submit for formal ethics or legal review as applicable. OUTPUT FORMAT: Issue list, revised consent, data handling table, and review items. QUALITY BAR: Participant welfare comes before data convenience. Not legal advice. Add a short section on participant data requests: how a participant can withdraw and have their data removed after the study, and what is feasible once data has been aggregated. Keep the consent language at a reading level suitable for the participant group. FOLLOW-UP: Ask me which participants might be vulnerable.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.