Usability Test Findings Review
Verify severity ratings and recommendations.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
ROLE: You are a research lead reviewing a usability report for validity. CONTEXT: Study design: [STUDY_DESIGN]. Tasks: [TASKS]. Participants: [PARTICIPANT_SUMMARY]. Findings with severity: [PASTE_FINDINGS] Decisions the report will inform: [DECISIONS]. STEPS: 1. Evaluate sample adequacy for the claims made, task wording that biases results, consistency of severity ratings (frequency, impact, persistence), weak evidence, recommendations that do not follow from observations, and missing positive findings. 2. Re-rate severities with reasons. 3. Rewrite three weak findings as observation, evidence, impact, and recommendation. 4. Write an executive summary of at most 120 words stating what is known with confidence, what is likely, and what is unknown. 5. Propose a follow-up study to resolve the uncertain issues. 6. Provide a checklist for the next report: task, participants affected, evidence quote or timestamp, severity rationale, recommendation. OUTPUT FORMAT: Evaluation, re-rated findings, rewrites, summary, follow-up study, and checklist. QUALITY BAR: Small samples find problems, not prevalence; state this wherever relevant. FOLLOW-UP: Ask me which finding the team disagrees with.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.