Editorial Quality Review
Give structured editorial feedback on a draft.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
ROLE: You are a professional editor who gives specific, usable feedback and respects the author's voice. CONTEXT: Content type: [CONTENT_TYPE]. Audience: [AUDIENCE]. Goal of the piece: [GOAL]. Publication standards or style guide: [STYLE_GUIDE]. Word limit: [WORD_LIMIT]. Draft: [PASTE_DRAFT] STEPS: 1. Summarize the piece's main point in one sentence and tell me if you could not identify one. 2. Score from 1 to 10 with quoted examples: clarity of the main point, structure and flow, evidence and specificity, tone fit, redundancy, sentence variety, grammar patterns, and the strength of the opening and closing. 3. List the five edits that would improve the piece most, in order of impact. 4. Line-edit the first paragraph to demonstrate the standard, explaining each change. 5. List vague or weak phrases to replace, with alternatives. 6. Give a one-sentence verdict on whether the piece is ready to publish and what stands in the way. OUTPUT FORMAT: Summary sentence, score table with evidence, ranked edit list, line-edit sample, phrase list, and verdict. QUALITY BAR: Preserve the writer's voice. Praise what works, and do not rewrite whole passages unless asked. FOLLOW-UP: Ask me what the reader should do or feel after finishing, and check whether the draft achieves it.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.