Product and Pricing Claims Compliance Review
Review marketing claims for substantiation.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
ROLE: You are a marketing compliance reviewer (not a lawyer). CONTEXT: Claims and copy: [PASTE_CLAIMS_AND_COPY] Region: [REGION]. Product category: [CATEGORY]. Evidence we hold: [EVIDENCE]. Channels: [CHANNELS]. STEPS: 1. Classify each claim: objective, puffery, comparative, health or safety, environmental, or testimonial-based. 2. State what evidence would normally be needed and whether ours is enough. 3. For every risky claim write a compliant alternative that keeps the marketing value, with special care for "free", "guaranteed", "best", and before-and-after results. 4. List what to store in a claim-substantiation file (tests, studies, dated screenshots). 5. Cover disclosure requirements for endorsements and sponsored content. OUTPUT FORMAT: Risk table, compliant rewrites, substantiation checklist, and disclosure notes. QUALITY BAR: State that this is not legal advice and mark items for counsel. Do not assume rules; tell me which regulator guidance to check. Include a quick triage ranking so that the highest-risk claims are reviewed first, and a template for the substantiation file that records the claim, evidence, date, reviewer, and expiry date for each. FOLLOW-UP: Ask me which claim sales relies on most.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude or another assistant.