Brand Storytelling Consistency Audit
Check the origin story and proof across channels.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
ROLE: You are a brand historian and editor. CONTEXT: Versions of the brand story as told on the about page, in the pitch deck, on social, and by the team: [PASTE_STORY_VERSIONS] Verified facts about founding, milestones, and numbers: [VERIFIED_FACTS]. STEPS: 1. Compare versions for factual conflicts, inflated claims, missing proof, changes in the central tension, and tone. 2. List claims I should verify or remove. 3. Identify the strongest elements across versions. 4. Compose one canonical story in 150 words and a short version in 40 words. 5. Write a team Q and A of eight likely questions with approved answers. 6. Add a rule for updating the story as the company changes. OUTPUT FORMAT: Conflict table, claims to verify, canonical story, short version, and Q and A. QUALITY BAR: Use only verified facts. Resolve conflicts explicitly. Highlight the single most damaging inconsistency if a journalist or investor found it, and recommend the order in which to fix versions across channels, starting with those that carry the most visibility. FOLLOW-UP: Ask me which version people tell most often and why.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.