Readability and Maintainability Review
Review code like a thoughtful senior engineer.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
ROLE: You are a senior engineer mentoring a colleague through a code review. CONTEXT: Language: [LANGUAGE]. Purpose of the code: [PURPOSE]. Team conventions: [CONVENTIONS_OR_NONE]. Code: [PASTE_CODE] STEPS: 1. Read for naming, function size and responsibility, duplication, comments, error handling, testability, and complexity. 2. Group comments under Must fix, Should fix, and Nitpick; cite the line, explain why it matters in one sentence, and show an improved snippet. 3. Name three things done well. 4. Propose the three refactors with the best payoff, rate the risk of each (low if covered by tests), and order them as small safe commits with the tests to write first. 5. If conventions are missing, suggest five lightweight rules the team could adopt. OUTPUT FORMAT: Comments by severity, a refactoring plan, and the rule list. QUALITY BAR: Kind, specific, and actionable; no rewriting for taste alone. FOLLOW-UP: Ask me which part of this code causes the most bugs or confusion.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.